For the past few years, one foreign government, an autocratic adversary in all but name, has jailed the families of American journalists, unleashed hackers and social media trolls by the tens of thousands, and injected a campaign to silence critics throughout the West, forcing publishers to back down and convincing American academic institutions to look the other way.\r\n\r\nThis dictatorship, building a police state and cult of personality at home, has attempted to export its one-party model abroad, attracting autocrats and smothering liberal democrats at every turn \u2013 all while, if recent photo ops are anything to go by, finding a sympathetic ear in the White House.\r\n\r\nThis dictatorship, however, isn\u2019t Russia.\r\n\r\nIt\u2019s China.\r\n\r\nFrom imprisoning spouses and siblings of American journalists to littering American academia with pro-Beijing institutes, China has led a campaign of influence and intimidation in the West that has outpaced Russia at nearly every turn. While there are no signs Beijing attempted to meddle in the recent American election to the extent Moscow did, Chinese officials have nonetheless exerted a campaign of subterfuge throughout Europe, the Americas, and Australia and New Zealand. The aim of the campaign is ending criticism wherever it may be found, and expanding China\u2019s autocratic diktat wherever it can.\r\n\r\n...\r\n\r\nThree years ago, Chinese authorities\u00a0began arresting\u00a0family members of Shohret Hoshur, an American journalist with Radio Free Asia. Hoshur\u2019s coverage of China\u2019s presence in Xinjiang, a colonial outpost along China\u2019s western reaches \u2013 and a\u00a0testing ground for Beijing\u2019s most illiberal surveillance and police tactics against the country\u2019s Muslim minority\u00a0\u2013 tweaked Chinese authorities, who proceeded to arrest a trio of Hoshur\u2019s brothers in retaliation for his coverage.\r\n\r\nA spokesperson for Radio Free Asia told ThinkProgress that two of Hoshur\u2019s brothers have since been released, but that one remains in prison. Numerous other employees of Radio Free Asia have also seen their families harassed, with certain male relatives \u201cdetained and put in re-education camps,\u201d according to the spokesperson.\r\n\r\nBut Radio Free Asia isn\u2019t the only outlet with American employees whose families have been targeted. Another American reporter, Chen Xiaoping \u2013 who had recently interviewed one of China\u2019s most well-known dissidents \u2013\u00a0revealed this week\u00a0that his wife has remained under police detention for months.\r\n\r\n...\r\nSchooled in silence\r\nUnfortunately, Guo is by no means the lone opposition voice China has attempted to silence on American soil. A\u00a0recent op-ed\u00a0from Wang Dan, a Chinese dissident who helped lead the Tiananmen Square protests nearly 30 years ago, described how the \u201cChinese Communist Party is extending its surveillance of critics abroad, reaching into Western academic communities and silencing visiting Chinese students. Through a campaign of fear and intimidation, Beijing is hindering free speech in the United States and in other Western countries.\u201d\r\n\r\nTactics include recruiting Chinese students in Western institutes to monitor other Chinese students expressing views critical of Beijing, or even those simply \u201cseen with political dissidents\u201d like Wang, with family members in China subsequently threatened or abducted. Other students in the U.S. critical of Beijing\u00a0have faced hacking campaigns\u00a0originating in China. Due to the surveillance, Chinese students in Australia have begun requesting tutorial classes\u00a0without other Chinese students.\r\n\r\n...\r\n\r\nElsewhere, China\u2019s Confucius Institutes, attached to dozens of universities across the U.S. \u2013 and hundreds of more abroad \u2013 have gained renewed attention for their pro-Chinese Communist Party slant, cowing school officials and pushing Beijing-friendly messaging throughout academia. Given that these Confucius Institutes are run out of official Chinese government agencies, they are, as The New York Review of Books\u2019 Richard Bernstein\u00a0wrote earlier this year, \u201coften \u2026 set up in secretive agreements with host institutions, which has caused Western scholars to question whether their universities are ceding undue control to a foreign government \u2013 in this instance, a foreign government well known for aggressively propagandizing its official views, censoring dissenting opinions, and imprisoning those who express them.\u201d\r\n\r\nNot only has Beijing pressured those working out of the Confucius Institutes to toe the state\u2019s line on controversial topics, ranging from Tibet to Taiwan to Tiananmen, but they also appear to bar members of the Falun Gong, a religious sect facing heavy persecution in China, from working, a clear violation of proscriptions against religious discrimination in the U.S.\u00a0A report from the National Endowment for Democracy this month\u00a0even found that taxpayers in numerous democracies fund these Confucius Institutes, helping subsidize China\u2019s state line on any number of topics.\r\n\r\n...\r\n\r\n\u201cI\u2019d say this to the United States: There\u2019s been a great emphasis on Russia, but in fact the real danger is China,\u201d Australian Charles Sturt University\u2019s Clive Hamilton added. \u201cChina\u2019s economy is eleven times bigger than Russia\u2019s. \u2026\u00a0It has deep business and financial links in the United States, it has a bigger diaspora in the United States. Really, that\u2019s where the focus should be.\u201d\r\n\r\nRead the original article in its entirety here.