Chen Yonglin Archives - Falun Dafa Information Center

The Hon Julie Bishop, Minister for Foreign Affairs stated on September 7th 2015, “The Australian Government considers that China’s ban on Falun Gong and its treatment of practitioners are in breach of international human rights standards… The Government has raised concerns about the treatment of Falun Gong practitioners, and about organs being harvested from executed prisoners, on numerous occasions.” In addition, successive Foreign Ministers have raised the persecution and related issues with their Chinese counterparts, while there have also been discussions during the Australia/China Bilateral Human Rights Dialogue with submissions having been made to that body by the Falun Dafa Association of Australia Inc. There have also been several presentations and submissions by the aforementioned Falun Dafa Association to the Human Rights Sub-Committee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade. Former Chinese Second Consul Chen Yonglin was granted political asylum by the Australian Government after he defected in 2005. Mr Chen’s revelations gave some indication of the highly organized campaign by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) since 1999 to disrupt Falun Gong activities and harass individual Falun Gong practitioners within Australia. He testified that there are over 1000 spies commissioned to spy on Falun Gong practitioners and activities in countries including Australia, Canada and The United States. He also stated how each Chinese consulate and Embassy function of spying on Falun Gong overseas “outweighs all other functions of the mission combined.” This was also confirmed by Mr Hao Fengjun, another defector, who was a former agent in the 610 Office of the Public Security Bureau from 2000 to 2004. Mr Hao stated that: “One of our main tasks at the 610 Office was to collect information on Falun Gong practitioners. This included practitioners from overseas as well as those living in China. We collected as much information on overseas practitioners as the locals. We even had files on Caucasian practitioners living in overseas countries.” Motions passed in the Australian Senate Four motions have been passed in the Australian Senate between December 2003 and November 2016. The first two specifically addressed the issue of the persecution of Falun Gong and included the statement that: ‘the practice of religion should not form the basis of the incarceration of any individual’. The second two motions sought to address the issue of forced organ harvesting. Senate Motion - Organ Procurement in Foreign Countries | 24 November 2016"That the Senate—notes: ...deeply concerning reports of unethical organ procurement procedures in foreign countries, including forced organ procurement from executed prisoners and prisoners of conscience in state-led processes..."Senate Motion no. 1212 | 21 March 2013On March 21st 2013, the Australian Senate unanimously passed a motion urging the Australian Government to oppose the practice of unethical organ harvesting in China... “The size of this petition and the public response to this issue has been staggering. The number of people signing this petition is more than three times as many people as signed all the petitions presented to the NSW Upper House in 2012.”Senate Motion no. 127 | 24 June 2008 "...The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights applies to the treatment of Falun Gong Practitioners worldwide, and...that the Senate expresses its support for an end to the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners in China..."Senate Motion no. 704 | 1 December 2003 "That the Senate...raise the issue of the continued detention of Falun Gong practitioners with close family ties to Australia, and) emphasise that the practise of religion should not form the basis of the incarceration of any individual; and reaffirms its commitment to freedom of belief within Australia and recognises the freedom of Australians to practise Falun Gong without fear of harassment."

Australian Government

Thuggery

Spies & Espionage

Student Organizations or Government Front?